Legal Opinion

Shoemaker v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 29, 1989No. 1—88—2919PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice DiVITO

Plaintiff-appellant, Sharon Shoemaker, appeals from an order of the circuit court granting defendant-appellee, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke’s Medical Center (Rush), summary judgment in a personal injury action. She contends that the circuit court erred in: (1) not affording her sufficient time to answer the motion for summary judgment; (2) granting summary judgment where a genuine issue of fact existed; and (3) granting summary judgment despite Rush’s duty to prevent injury caused even by natural accumulations of water in its building.

Plaintiff’s left leg had been amputated just below the knee…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Lance v. SeniorIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  3. McCann v. Bethesda HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Springer v. FordIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Gehrman v. ZajacAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Krywin v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Fillpot v. Midway Airlines, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. Frederick v. Professional Truck Driver Training School, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  4. Richter v. Burton Investment Properties, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. Branson v. R & L INVESTMENT, INC.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API