Burckle v. Adams Bros.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
. Appeal by the defendant, the Adams Brothers Company (Incorporated), from a judgment of the Municipal Court óf the city of New York, borough of Brooklyn, second district, in favor of the plaintiffs, rendered on the 14th day of November, 1900.
1Opinion of the Court
Hirschberg, J.:
This judgment cannot be sustained on the theory urged by the plaintiffs, viz;, that the defendant has exercised its option to renew the lease for one year, and that all negotiations for a new lease were incidental and subordinate to that fact. The. defendant had a lease under the plaintiffs’ decedent which expired February 1, 1900. This lease, by its terms, gave the defendant the right and option of renewal from year to year for nine years “ on condition and provided, however, that for each such yearly renewal or extension, it shall serve upon the party of the first part at'…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sullivan v. George Ringler & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901