Sullivan v. George Ringler & Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, George Ringler &: Company, from a ' judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 28th day of July, 1900, upon the verdict of a jury rendered by direction of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Sewell, J.:
There is only one question which it is necessary to consider in the disposition of this appeal, .and that is whether .the holding over by the sub-tenant made the defendant, as a matter of law, a tenant for another year upon the terms of the prior lease.
It is without dispute that the lease ended by its terms on May 1, 1898, which was Sunday; that a petition was filed by the defendant in the Municipal Court on the second day of May, and a precept issued returnable on that day requiring Wallace, the sub-tenant, to show cause why he should not be dispossessed. An answer was filed by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Haynes v. . AldrichNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Board of Commissioners of Pilots v. ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Frost v. Akron Iron Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stahl Associates Co. v. MapesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Comedy v. VitoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Byrns v. PierceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1912
- Burckle v. Adams Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Kerruish v. Cleveland & S. Brew. Co.Cuyahoga Circuit Court · 1911