Legal Opinion

Boardley v. United States Department of Interior

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 7, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2007-1986PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER [Resolving Doc. 64.]

JAMES S. GWIN, 1 District Judge:

Plaintiff Michael Boardley seeks a judgment for costs and attorney expenses after his successful First-Amendment challenge to regulations promulgated by the Department of the Interior. [Doc. 64.] For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the motion in part, and DENIES it in part.

I

Plaintiff Michael Boardley “filed this action, seeking a declaration that the [National Park Service] regulations are unconstitutional and violative of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb-1, on their face and as applied…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Outlaw Laboratory, LP v. DG in PB, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API