Boardley v. United States Department of Interior
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER [Resolving Doc. 64.]
JAMES S. GWIN, 1 District Judge:
Plaintiff Michael Boardley seeks a judgment for costs and attorney expenses after his successful First-Amendment challenge to regulations promulgated by the Department of the Interior. [Doc. 64.] For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the motion in part, and DENIES it in part.
I
Plaintiff Michael Boardley “filed this action, seeking a declaration that the [National Park Service] regulations are unconstitutional and violative of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb-1, on their face and as applied…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Outlaw Laboratory, LP v. DG in PB, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020