Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Rodgers

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 2, 1909No. 1,603PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the United States Court for China.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Circuit Judge.

The appellant, alleging himself to be of Rockland, county of Knox, in the state of Maine, administrator of the estate of Henry H. Cunningham, of Belfast, Me., brought suit in the United States Court for China at Shanghai against the appellee as Consul General at Shanghai, China, to recover the sum of $8,000 on the official bond of appellee as Consul General, and the further sum of $50,165.85 from the appellee personally.

For cause of action the appellant alleged: That Henry H. Cunningham died intestate at Shanghai, China, on the 10th day of June, 1905, possessed of a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Noonan v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Stephens v. Monongahela BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Piquignot v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  4. Toeg v. SuffertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Bakelite Corp'n.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Grand Trunk Western R. v. McHieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
  3. McHie v. McHieCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API