Legal Opinion

Lindenbaum v. City of Philadelphia

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 1984No. Civ. A. 83-984PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.

On February 5, 1981, the Philadelphia City Council enacted Bill 474 which reads as follows:

SECTION 1. Section 129 of the Retirement System Ordinance is hereby amended by adding a new Subsection 129(c) to read as follows:

§ 129. Minimum Pensions for Full-Time, Non-Uniformed Employees And Their Beneficiaries.(c) All retired members of District Council 33 who, on July 1, 1980, have been retired for five (5) or more years and who had fifteen (15) or more years of credited service with the Municipal Retirement System at the time of retirement, shall receive an…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania State Troopers' Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. In re Dissolution of the Independent Fire Co. No. 4 of Milton, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northumberland County1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API