Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Iowa Central Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 3, 1905PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Marshall District Court.— Hon. G. W. Burn- ' ham, Judge. Action at law to recover damages for personal injuries received by plaintiff while in defendant’s employ as a car repairer. Trial to a jury, verdict and judgment for plaintiff,, and defendant appeals.—

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.

I. Defendant’s yards in {he city of Marshalltown cover many blocks of ground, and between the passenger station and the roundhouse and machine shops there are countless tracks, main line and switches, running almost east and west. North of the engine house and the turntable is the coal chute, and between them are three tracks, running east and west. The northernmost of these tracks, running close to and parallel with the coal chute, is known as the “ co'al track.” South of the coal track, and within a short distance thereof, was the repair or “ rip track,” also running nearly east and-west.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Frandsen v. C., R. I. & P. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  2. Barry v. Burlington Railway & Light Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  3. Kenosha Stove Co. v. SheddSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  4. Foley v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  5. Hall v. Incorporated Town of MansonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCormick v. Ottumwa Railway & Light Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  2. Voris v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Russell v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  4. Slaats v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API