Legal Opinion

Hall v. Incorporated Town of Manson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 12, 1894PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from Calhom District Court. — Hon. G-eoeg-e W. Paine, Judge. Action for damages resulting from personal injuries. Trial to jury. Yerdict for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtKinne, J.

I. In 1891 the defendant town, for the purpose of laying its mains for water, had excavated a ditch about six feet deep on and along Second street, and near the north side thereof, which excavation extended across Main street in said town. There was a crossing on the west side of Main street extending over said Second street, and said excavation came up to the sides of said crossing near the north side of Second street. This sidewalk crossing was three feet wide. The excavation spoken of had existed for some weeks prior to the occurrence of the injury in question. A water pipe had been laid…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mewhirter v. HattenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  2. Fleming v. Town of ShenandoahSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  3. Russ v. The Steamboat War EagleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
  4. Grant v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  5. Tuttle v. C., R. I. & P. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1876

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Mentzer v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  2. Langhammer v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  3. DeWall v. PrenticeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  4. Hall v. Incorporated TownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  5. Cushman v. Carbondale Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API