Legal Opinion

State v. Brooks

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 26, 1997No. 17922PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Dickinson, Presiding Judge.

The state of Ohio has appealed from the trial court’s refusal to reimpose the death penalty against defendant Antonio Brooks., The trial court followed the Ohio Supreme Court’s mandate and resentenced defendant in accordance with that court’s reversal of his death sentence. The state has argued that the trial court should have reimposed the death penalty because the Ohio Supreme Court’s reversal of it was based on an instruction that was never given to the jury. This court affirms the judgment of the trial court because extraordinary circumstances did not exist to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. BrooksOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Potain v. MathewsOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Reichert v. IngersollOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State ex rel. Crandall, Pheils & Wisniewski v. DeCessnaOhio Supreme Court · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BrooksOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API