Henderson v. Croom
District Court, N.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GUIN, District Judge.
STATEMENT OF CASE
The plaintiffs charge the defendants with a conspiracy to defraud them in connection with the sale of their stock in Coastal United Enterprises, Inc., a Florida corporation (“Coastal”), in violation of the Securities Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 adopted pursuant thereto. [15 U.S.C.A. § 78j (b); 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5] The Complaint contains six counts. The plaintiffs have filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment under Count III. That Count alleges in substance that at the time the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fulghum v. Town of SelmaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. PaulkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Piedmont Supply Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1961
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. HaslipSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. HaslipSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989