Legal Opinion

Xcel Energy Services Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 14, 2007No. 06-1174PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge WILLIAMS.

WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge:

Section 205 of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. § 824d, and FERC regulations, 18 C.F.R. § 35.3, require that utilities provide 60 days prior notice to the Federal Regulatory Energy Commission before a rate takes effect. FERC may waive that requirement, however, “for good cause shown.” Id. at § 35.11. Xcel Energy Services, Inc. challenges FERC’s decision not to waive the prior notice requirement for four interconnection agreements that Xcel filed more than four years after the effective date chosen by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. The City of Piqua, Ohio v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Dayton Power and Light Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  3. NSTAR Electric & Gas Corp. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  4. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  5. Power Co. of America, L.P. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aera Energy LLC v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
  2. Aera Energy LLC v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API