State v. Scovill
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.
The defendant, Timothy Scovill, appeals his conviction on two counts of felonious sexual assault in violation of RSA *410632-A:3 (1996) (amended 1997) following a jury trial, arguing that the Superior Court (Smith, J.) erred in admitting the complainant’s journal as substantive evidence rather than as impeachment evidence. We reverse and remand.
The following facts were adduced at trial. The complainant and the defendant first met in December 1995. A few days later, the complainant and the defendant met again, and she disclosed to him that she was thirteen years old. The defendant informed her…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Robert B. Sutton, United States of America v. Mark A. SucherCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Vincent Coppola v. Ronald L. Powell, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Angel Pendas-Martinez and Andres Morrero-LasoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Panas v. HarakisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- State v. KirschSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. BaderSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- State v. PelletierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- Matter of GendronSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
- In Re Grand Jury SubpoenaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.