Legal Opinion

Hendry v. Hendry

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1869PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Steuben Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.

The complaint consists of one paragraph, for goods sold and delivered, money borrowed, and money paid, laid out, and expended, accompanied by a bill of particulars. The appellant moved to strike out that part of the complaint for money borrowed, and money paid, laid out, and expended. The court below overruled the motion, and this is complained of as error. If a paragraph of a complaint is double, the remedy is by motion to compel the plaintiff to separate the causes of action into paragraphs, and to number them. The motion to strike out was properly overruled.

The appellant answered in seven…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Irish v. SnelsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Raymond v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Booher v. GoldsboroughIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Skillen v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Briggs v. DaughertyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Shaw v. AyersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. McClellandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API