Kurtz v. Enterprise Telephone Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
The complainants in this case filed a bill in equity to enjoin the defendant, its agents, employees and workmen, from going on premises described in the bill, belonging* to them, the complainants, and erecting, renewing or repairing the telephone pole line which the defendant had constructed thereon twenty-two years before and maintained ever since.
Within eight days after the filing of the bill and the issuing of a preliminary injunction thereunder, the defendant filed an answer raising as a preliminary objection to the bill, that “the exclusive remedy of the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wettengel v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- O'Neil v. McKeesportSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Washburn's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
- Grubb's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
- Tillmes v. MarshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- TEACHER v. KijurinaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Hesselman v. Somerset Community HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Mertz v. MertzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Globe Solvents, Inc. v. Nouskhajiau TrusteeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Bajor v. Bell Telephone Co.Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.