Legal Opinion

Kurtz v. Enterprise Telephone Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 1933No. Appeal 130PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

The complainants in this case filed a bill in equity to enjoin the defendant, its agents, employees and workmen, from going on premises described in the bill, belonging* to them, the complainants, and erecting, renewing or repairing the telephone pole line which the defendant had constructed thereon twenty-two years before and maintained ever since.

Within eight days after the filing of the bill and the issuing of a preliminary injunction thereunder, the defendant filed an answer raising as a preliminary objection to the bill, that “the exclusive remedy of the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wettengel v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. O'Neil v. McKeesportSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  3. Washburn's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  4. Grubb's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  5. Tillmes v. MarshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. TEACHER v. KijurinaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Hesselman v. Somerset Community HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Mertz v. MertzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Globe Solvents, Inc. v. Nouskhajiau TrusteeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Bajor v. Bell Telephone Co.Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API