Legal Opinion

Bajor v. Bell Telephone Co.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas

Decided September 28, 1953Published

1Opinion of the Court

Hagan, J.,

Plaintiffs filed a complaint in equity, seeking to restrain defendant, Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania, from entering upon the premises of plaintiffs for the purpose of repairing certain communication equipment owned by defendant, and to compel defendant to remove this equipment from the premises.

The answer of defendant avers that the equipment had been installed and maintained on the premises of plaintiffs by virtue of an irrevocable license given to defendant by plaintiffs’ predecessors in title.

A stipulation of facts was submitted to the court, and in pursuance thereof the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tide Water Pipe Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Huff v. McCauleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866
  3. Leininger v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Thompson v. McElarneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876
  5. Swartz v. SwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1846

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API