Legal Opinion

In Re Hallinan

California Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1969No. Crim. 13216PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.

Petitioner Vincent Hallinan, an attorney, seeks annulment of an. order of direct contempt issued by the San Francisco Superior Court, sentencing petitioner to five days in jail, As hereinafter appears, we have concluded that the facts set forth in the order fail to support the finding of contemptuous behavior, and that the order should be annulled.

The conduct found contemptuous occurred during the jury trial of a defendant represented by petitioner and charged with battery upon a police officer. Contempt committed in the immediate view and presence of the court, known as direct contempt, may…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Arthur v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Lyons v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Cooper v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Gallagher v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. In the Matter of David DellingerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  2. Commonwealth v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. In Re BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. McKinnon v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Continental Insurance Companies v. Bayless & Roberts, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API