Legal Opinion

United States v. William Alfred Florence

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 20, 1984No. 83-2537PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

In this appeal William Florence, the appellant, attacks the district court’s 1 2 order imposing restitution under the authority of 18 U.S.C. §§ 3579 and 3580. These statutes are argued to be unconstitutional and the imposition of restitution an abuse of discretion. We affirm.

Facts

On September 30, 1983, the appellant entered a plea of guilty to a single count indictment which charged him with armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d). At the sentencing hearing held on November 4, 1983, the court reviewed the Victim Impact Statement which stated that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. LemireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  4. Lawrence Leroy Farrow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. Karel PlisekCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. United States v. Wilbert Brown, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  2. United States v. Joseph PalmaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. Norman H. KeithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. United States v. ThirionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. Harold B. KailCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API