Legal Opinion

Fero v. H. M. Loud & Sons Lumber Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1894PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Alcona. (Simpson, J.) Bill for the specific performance of a land contract. Defendant' appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The defendant is the successor of the Oschda Salt & Lumber Company. This bill is filed for the specific performance of a land contract, bearing date the 12th day of April, 1886, between the Oscoda Salt & Lumber Company and the complainant, by the terms of which the company agreed to sell to complainant 40 acres *311of land in township 26 N, range 8 E., for the agreed price of $80, payable in installments. The defense set np is that, by mistake of the parties, a provision in the written contract reserving the timber was omitted, and the answer asks that the written contract be reformed so as to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Osterhout & Fox Lumber Co. v. RiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dolsen v. KearneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API