Legal Opinion
Connell v. Bernstein-Macaulay, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 26, 1976No. 72 Civ. 3272PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WHITMAN KNAPP, District Judge.
In these securities cases plaintiffs (including United States Steel and Carnegie Pension Fund, Inc. — here referred to as the Fund) seek recovery under the 1933 and 1934 Acts for damages claimed to have been sustained as a result of their purchase of securities of the Topper Corporation (“Topper”), a company which subsequently went bankrupt. The defendants include various persons (here collectively referred to as the Hayden Stone defendants) concerned with the underwriting of such securities. The question now before the court is whether it…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hearn v. RhayDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1975
- Burlington Industries v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974
- Laverne v. Incorporated Village of Laurel HollowSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Laverne v. Incorporated Village of Laurel HollowNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Laverne v. INC. VILL. OF LAUREL HOLLOWNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
3Cited by29 opinions
- Bowne of New York City, Inc. v. AmBase Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Pritchard v. County of ErieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Remington Arms Co. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1992
- Jakobleff v. Cerrato, Sweeney & CohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- League v. VaniceNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.