Legal Opinion
Frank. J. Mee v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 31, 1963No. 17041PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENSON, District Judge.
This is an appeal in forma pauperis by Frank J. Mee from a judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict of guilty. The indictment charged appellant and co-defendants Walter E. Fisher and Joseph E. Lindquist with conspiring to use the mails to defraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. The alleged scheme to defraud involved the obtaining of sums of money from two insurance companies on burglary insurance policies. There was evidence that the burglary was feigned and that the claims were false. Some of the articles claimed as a loss by appellant were found buried near the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Victor Harry Feguer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Wheaton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- John P. Tillman, Robert Barber Moore, Johnny C. Wilson, Larry Fox, Donald P. Stone and Michael W. Simmons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. James O. Gambrill, United States of America v. Jerry L. HunterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Rex M. Haggard v. United States of America, Lee Alley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. Raymond Craig Wilson, United States of America v. Wilbert PolkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Charles Gersh, Anthony Mugnola and Peter YuastellaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.