Legal Opinion

Banks v. Mortimer

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 23, 2021No. 4:18-cv-07391-HSGUnknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 GREGORY A BANKS, et al., Case No. 18-cv-07391-HSG 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND 9 v. BIFURCATING AND STAYING DERIVATIVE LIABILITY CLAIMS 10 MICHAEL MORTIMER, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 58 11 Defendants. 12 13 Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ municipal (“Monell”) 14 liability and supervisor liability claims. 1 Dkt. No. 58. The Court has carefully considered the 15 parties’ briefs. For the reasons set forth below the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE 16…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. City of Los Angeles v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API