Banks v. Mortimer
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 GREGORY A BANKS, et al., Case No. 18-cv-07391-HSG 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND 9 v. BIFURCATING AND STAYING DERIVATIVE LIABILITY CLAIMS 10 MICHAEL MORTIMER, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 58 11 Defendants. 12 13 Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ municipal (“Monell”) 14 liability and supervisor liability claims. 1 Dkt. No. 58. The Court has carefully considered the 15 parties’ briefs. For the reasons set forth below the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE 16…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- City of Los Angeles v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.