Legal Opinion
Kentucky Hydro-Electric Co. v. Woodard
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided October 15, 1926PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Dietzman
Reversing on the original appeal and affirming on the cross-appeal.
The appellant, Kentucky Hydro-Electric Company, is a Delaware corporation which has constructed and is now operating a hydro-electric, plant on the Dix river near its junction with the Kentucky river. It transmits the electricity there generated over a transmission line which runs from the plant through Mercer and other counties until it reaches the Ohio river near Louisville in Jefferson county. There the transmission line crosses the Ohio river into Indiana. The power thus transmitted is…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Woolfolk v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. White Villa ClubCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Cramer v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
- Louisville Nashville Rr. Co. v. Burnam, TrusteeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Dempsey v. HortonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
- Heddin v. Delhi Gas Pipeline CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- Morris v. Atlas Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- Tennessee Gas & Transmission Co. v. JackmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.