Legal Opinion

Scott v. Thunderbird Industries, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 15, 1982No. 56261PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYDSTON, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff Employee, Sterling F. Scott, Jr., appeals from denial of motion for new trial sustaining trial court’s summary judgment in favor of defendant Thunderbird Industries, Inc. Employee was injured when the coating inside a tank he was welding exploded. He pursued his compensation remedy and then sued Thunderbird Industries, Inc., steam cleaning equipment manufacturer, and its subassembler-manufacturer, Metalfab Industries, Inc., trailer and tank manufacturer, on theories of manufacturers’ products liability and negligence.

The facts are relatively undisputed.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  2. Runyon v. ReidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  3. Stuckey v. Young Exploration Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  4. Northrip v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  5. Weaver v. Pryor JeffersonianSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ettinger v. Triangle-Pacific Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Duane v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Avey v. Hillcrest Medical CenterCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
  4. Vince Allen & Associates, Inc. v. Delhi Gas Pipeline Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1989
  5. Spence v. Brown-Minneapolis Tank, Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API