Legal Opinion
Lugo v. Gardner
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 25, 1966No. 65 Civ. 1859PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANKEL, District Judge.
Plaintiff sues under Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for review of an administrative decision denying his claim under Sections 216(i) and 223, 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i) and 423,1 for disability *722insurance benefits. The Secretary, having filed the administrative record in accordance with the statute, has moved for judgment on the pleadings. Plaintiff, while he makes no cross-motion, attacks the agency’s ruling as arbitrary, capricious, and unsupported by the requisite substantial evidence. The opposing submissions are sufficient to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Clistie Bell Thomas v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of the Department of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- Philip Kerner v. Arthur S. Flemming, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Andrew C. Mark v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Shirley A. Ber v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- William T. Miracle v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Odella PRESTON, Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Thomas v. AstrueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Rosa v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1974