Legal Opinion

Scott v. Board of Adjustment

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 2, 1965No. 4403PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, Justice.

Two taxpayers brought an injunction proceeding against the City of Corpus Christi, its Board of Adjustment and Greater Corpus Enterprises, Inc., operator of Ramada Inn, to restrain maintenance of a sign authorized by the Board as a variance under the city zoning ordinance. Plaintiffs prayed that the Board’s decision and the permit issued thereunder be declared void. Summary judgment was rendered dismissing the action on the ground plaintiffs had no justiciable interest which would justify their prosecution of the suit. We affirm.

The zoning ordinance limits the size of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. W.D. Yett, Mayor v. CookTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. City of San Antonio v. StrumbergTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Hoffman v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  4. San Antonio Conservation Soc. v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Harrell v. LynchTexas Supreme Court · 1885

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Scott v. Board of AdjustmentTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Pierce v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  3. City of Dickinson, Texas v. Larry Stefan, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2020
  4. Scott v. Board of AdjustmentTexas Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API