Legal Opinion

Arthur William Montgomery v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided November 30, 2007No. 03-07-00448-CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-06-00218-CV Rox Covert, Duke Covert and Danay Covert, Appellants v. Williamson Central Appraisal District, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 277TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 01-466-C277, HONORABLE KEN ANDERSON, JUDGE PRESIDING OPINION In this appeal, we decide whether a taxpayer is entitled under section 42.26 of the tax code to challenge only the land component of an ad valorem property tax appraisal of improved land, without claiming that the total appraised value of the property is unequal. See

Tex. Tax Code Ann. §…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Transportation v. City of Sunset ValleyTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Sorokolit v. RhodesTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Reliance Insurance Co. v. Denton Central Appraisal DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. Meno v. KitchensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Butler Weldments Corp. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API