Guardian Builders, LLC v. Uselton
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMoore, Chief Justice
I concur in reversing the award of attorney fees, but I respectfully dissent from reversing the award of the arbitration fees.
I have three objections to applying the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. (“the FAA”), to enforce predispute arbitration agreements. I explained two of my three objections in my dissent in Selma Medical Center, Inc. v. Fontenot, 824 So.2d 668, 677 (Ala.2001) (Moore, C.J., dissenting):
“First, because the FAA in its entirety establishes a set of procedures intended to apply only in United States district courts, it has no application in a case such as this,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Home Ins. Co. v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Riddlesbarger v. Hartford InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Ex Parte McNaughtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Birmingham News Co. v. HornSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- Horton Homes, Inc. v. ShanerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.