Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Guardian Builders, LLC v. Uselton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 11, 2014No. 1121534Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMoore, Chief Justice

I concur in reversing the award of attorney fees, but I respectfully dissent from reversing the award of the arbitration fees.

I have three objections to applying the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. (“the FAA”), to enforce predispute arbitration agreements. I explained two of my three objections in my dissent in Selma Medical Center, Inc. v. Fontenot, 824 So.2d 668, 677 (Ala.2001) (Moore, C.J., dissenting):

“First, because the FAA in its entirety establishes a set of procedures intended to apply only in United States district courts, it has no application in a case such as this,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Home Ins. Co. v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Riddlesbarger v. Hartford InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Ex Parte McNaughtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  4. Birmingham News Co. v. HornSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  5. Horton Homes, Inc. v. ShanerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API