Legal Opinion

Keel Ex Rel. Keel v. Bailey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 28, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaeicsoN, J.

Does the judgment by confession in favor of Bettie Bailey and against Robert Bailey constitute a legal, valid and enforceable lien upon the Dawes tract? We think so.

In the judgment of the court below is the following: “That the judgment confessed by Robert Bailey in favor of Bettie Bailey on 29 September, 1930, in the sum of $6,900 and costs, and docketed on 1 October, 1930, in Book 11, page 143, in the office of the clerk of the Superior Court of Wilson County, be and it hereby is declared a legal, valid and subsisting lien upon the land situate in Wilson County known as the Ben Dawes tract,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. . LeavittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Hood v. . MercerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  3. Linker v. . LinkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Farmers Bank of Clayton v. McCullersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Mahen v. RuhrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCullen v. DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. McCullen v. . DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Porter v. CITIZENS BANK OF WARRENTON, INCORPORATEDSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Keel v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API