Keel Ex Rel. Keel v. Bailey
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClaeicsoN, J.
Does the judgment by confession in favor of Bettie Bailey and against Robert Bailey constitute a legal, valid and enforceable lien upon the Dawes tract? We think so.
In the judgment of the court below is the following: “That the judgment confessed by Robert Bailey in favor of Bettie Bailey on 29 September, 1930, in the sum of $6,900 and costs, and docketed on 1 October, 1930, in Book 11, page 143, in the office of the clerk of the Superior Court of Wilson County, be and it hereby is declared a legal, valid and subsisting lien upon the land situate in Wilson County known as the Ben Dawes tract,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Johnson v. . LeavittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Hood v. . MercerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Linker v. . LinkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Farmers Bank of Clayton v. McCullersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Mahen v. RuhrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McCullen v. DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- McCullen v. . DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Porter v. CITIZENS BANK OF WARRENTON, INCORPORATEDSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Keel v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941