Legal Opinion

Farmers Bank of Clayton v. McCullers

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 1931PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, 0. J.

It is conceded tbat tbe deeds in question, executed between husband and wife during coverture, which purport to affect or change the real estate of the wife, were not probated as required by O. S., 2515, in that, the officer in each instance failed to certify in his certificate of probate that at the time of its execution and the wife’s privy examination, such contract was “not unreasonable or injurious to her.” This omission renders the deeds void. Capps v. Massey, 199 N. C., 196, 154 S. E., 52; Caldwell v. Blount, 193 N. C., 560, 137 S. E., 578; Garner v. Horner, 191 N. C., 539,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Rankin v. OatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Stratton v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Rankin v. . OatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Butts v. . ScrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  5. Farwell v. HustonIllinois Supreme Court · 1894

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Abdalla v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Temple v. TempleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Chrysler Credit Corp. v. BurtonDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1984
  4. Foxman v. . HanesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Bolin v. BolinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API