Legal Opinion

Mair v. Southern Minnesota Broadcasting Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 16, 1948No. 34,621PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Magney, Justice.

Plaintiff sued defendant to recover $l-,250, his agreed salary for two months, claiming that defendant had violated and breached its contract of employment with him. The court directed a verdict for plaintiff. Defendant appeals from the order denying its motion for a new trial.

Defendant owns and operates a radio broadcasting station with studios in Rochester and Owatonna, Minnesota. On August 1, 1945, defendant employed plaintiff as its general manager for a term of five years, at a fixed salary per year, with a bonus, depending upon the increased profits of the business. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bang v. International Sisal Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Von Heyne v. TompkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  3. Cooper v. Stronge & Warner Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  4. Koons v. LangumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Colvig v. RKO General, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Trapkus v. Edstrom's, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  3. Briggs v. American & Efird Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Anthony v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  5. Van Steenhouse v. Jacor Broadcasting of Colorado, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API