In re Kinney
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
This disciplinary action was initiated by the filing of a five count complaint alleging professional misconduct on the part of the Respondent, Martin H. Kinney. The matter is now before this Court on the Hearing Officer’s report. Neither party has petitioned for review as permitted under Admission and Discipline Rule 23. Upon our de novo review, we now accept the Hearing Officer’s tendered findings and conclusions as stated herein and impose discipline.
Count I.
The Respondent was charged in Count I with failing to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in perfecting…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Matter of CawleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Matter of SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Matter of WellsIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Matter of HuebnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Matter of FoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of KinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1996