Legal Opinion

United Oil Refining Co. v. Larkins

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1927No. Docket No. 164Published

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Plaintiff is assignee of the lessee in a lease of a parcel of land in Detroit. An option to purchase was an integral part of the lease. It filed bill for specific performance of the option and was met by the defense that the lease and option had been canceled and surrendered. Defendant had decree. Plaintiff has appealed.

In November, 1924, MacDonald owned or controlled all of the capital stock of plaintiff company, which conducted a number of oil stations which it possessed under several leases. Its most valuable asset was the lease and option first mentioned. It was insolvent. MacDonald…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. BristolMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Brown v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Pontiac Nursery Co. v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API