Legal Opinion

Winterrowd v. Messick

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1871PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from the Shelby Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.

There' is no question in this'case, except that the record shows that three different judges sat, successively, during the making of the issues and trial of the cause, without any evidence in the record of their appointment.

No objection was made, or question reserved, in the court below with reference to the appointment or qualifications of the gentlemen who held the court.

Under the later rulings of this court, the question cannot be presented, now for the first time. Feaster v. Woodfill, 23 Ind. 493; Hyatt v. Hyatt, 33 Ind. 309; Watts v. The State, 33 Ind. 237.

The judgment is affirmed, with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Feaster v. WoodfillIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Watts v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Hyatt v. HyattIndiana Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Smurr v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Kenney v. PhillipyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Bartley v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. State ex rel. Cropper v. MurdockIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Kennedy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API