Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Fox

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 13, 1985No. 1429PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Robert Fox was tried by jury and was found guilty of an attempt to commit criminal trespass.1 The trial court granted a motion in arrest of judgment because it deemed the evidence insufficient to sustain the convictions. The Commonwealth appealed. We reverse.

A criminal trespass occurs when a person, knowing that he is not privileged to do so, breaks into a building. 18 Pa.C.S. § 3503(a)(1)(h). An attempt occurs when a person, with intent to commit a specific crime, does any act which constitutes a substantial step toward the commission of that crime. 18 Pa.C.S. § 901.

Although…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. StanleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Commonwealth v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. KeblitisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. D'AlonzoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Com. v. Leitner, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API