Commonwealth v. Fox
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
Robert Fox was tried by jury and was found guilty of an attempt to commit criminal trespass.1 The trial court granted a motion in arrest of judgment because it deemed the evidence insufficient to sustain the convictions. The Commonwealth appealed. We reverse.
A criminal trespass occurs when a person, knowing that he is not privileged to do so, breaks into a building. 18 Pa.C.S. § 3503(a)(1)(h). An attempt occurs when a person, with intent to commit a specific crime, does any act which constitutes a substantial step toward the commission of that crime. 18 Pa.C.S. § 901.
Although…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. StanleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. KeblitisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. D'AlonzoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Com. v. Leitner, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015