Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Keblitis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 9, 1983No. 80-3-563PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Justice.

This action originally involved four defendants, to wit the appellant, Edward Joseph Keblitis, Jr., and his wife, Elizabeth S. Keblitis, as well as Dennis William McArdle, and his wife, Mary Ann Mortenson McArdle, all of whom, in a joint nonjury trial in the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County, were found guilty of possession of marihuana with intent to deliver and manufacture of marihuana by growing. 1 Post-trial motions in arrest of judgment were granted as to the possession offenses but dismissed as to the manufacturing offenses. On appeal to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CocciolettiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. TIRPAKSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Commonwealth v. SchulhoffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Miller v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. HolcombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. BeasleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. HallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API