Legal Opinion

Dresser v. Southern Cal. Edison Co., Ltd.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 21, 1938No. Civ. 1874PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant rendered after the trial court had granted its motion for nonsuit.

Plaintiff has moved for a diminution of the record by including in it a purported judgment dated December 7, 1937. This document can add nothing to the record and is not necessary to a decision of the case. (Southern Pac. R. R. Co. v. Willett, 216 Cal. 387 [14 Pac. (2d) 526] ; McColgan v. Jones, Hubbard & Donnell, Inc., 11 Cal. (2d) 243 [78 Pac. (2d) 1010].)

Defendant has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the notice of appeal was filed prior to the time of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Railroad v. WillettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Shade v. Bay Counties Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. McColgan v. Jones, Hubbard & Donnell, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Elliott v. Black River Electric CooperativeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  2. Hamilton v. Laclede Electric CooperativeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  3. City of Williston v. CribbsSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  4. Benard v. VorlanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Hale v. Montana-Dakota Utilities Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API