Legal Opinion

(PS) Beaton v. Amazon.Com, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 31, 2019No. 2:19-cv-02394Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PAUL NIVARD BEATON, No. 2:19-cv-02394 KJM AC PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMNENDATIONS 14 AMAZON.COM, INC., 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

and 18 has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP’) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This 19 proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). IFP 20 status was granted by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto (ECF No. 3), before she…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API