State v. Hill
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rivera-Soto
This appeal requires that we address a conflict in decisions from the Appellate Division and presents a discrete yet repeatedly vexing question: what, if any, predicate crimes must merge with a felony murder conviction for sentencing purposes when more than one predicate crime has been proven.
We hold that there is a “compelling need for the use of special verdict[ ] [forms],” State v. Diaz, 144 N.J. 628, 644, 677 A.2d 1120, 1127 (1996), under Rule 3:19-l(b) for the jury to designate which felony or felonies constitute the predicate crime for a felony murder conviction. If the jury designates…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. YarboughSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- State v. SimonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. SchoonmakerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. MessinoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- State v. Troy N. Tate (069314)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Berenson v. USA Hockey, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.