Legal Opinion

State v. Hill

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 9, 2005PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rivera-Soto

This appeal requires that we address a conflict in decisions from the Appellate Division and presents a discrete yet repeatedly vexing question: what, if any, predicate crimes must merge with a felony murder conviction for sentencing purposes when more than one predicate crime has been proven.

We hold that there is a “compelling need for the use of special verdict[ ] [forms],” State v. Diaz, 144 N.J. 628, 644, 677 A.2d 1120, 1127 (1996), under Rule 3:19-l(b) for the jury to designate which felony or felonies constitute the predicate crime for a felony murder conviction. If the jury designates…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. YarboughSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. State v. SimonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  4. State v. MartinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  5. State v. DavisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. SchoonmakerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. MessinoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  3. State v. Troy N. Tate (069314)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  5. Berenson v. USA Hockey, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API