Perotti v. Carty
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HERMAN JACOB WEBER, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon a Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate (doc. no. 14). The Magistrate recommends that defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. no. 9) be granted and that plaintiff Perotti’s Complaint be dismissed because plaintiff is barred from bringing this prisoner civil rights action as the Complaint was not filed within the one-year statute of limitations set forth in Mulligan v. Hazard, 777 F.2d 340 (6th Cir.1985).
Mr. Perotti has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate (doc.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Linda Mulligan v. Francis HazardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Campbell v. GuyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
- Perdue v. HandelmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
- Vargas v. JagoDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1986
3Cited by3 opinions
- Edward Lewis Higley v. Michigan Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Hambrick v. DaviesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1989
- Miller v. StevensOhio Court of Appeals · 1988