Legal Opinion

Caylor Lumber Co. v. Mays

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided August 13, 1918No. 9436PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from County Court, Atoka County; M. C. Hailey, Judge. Action by the Caylor Lumber Company against A. B. Mays and Hattie G. Mays. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PRYOR, C.

This is an action in replevin commenced by the Caylor Lumber Company again’st A. B. Mays for the possession of certain furniture under and by virtue of a chattel mortgage given by A. B. Mays to the plaintiff. Hattie G. Mays, the wife of A. B. Mays, interpleaded and claimed the furniture to be her separate property. There was a trial as to the ownership of the property between the Caylor Lumber Company and Hattie G. Mays, which resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the interpleader, Hattie G. Mays. From this judgment the plaintiff company appeals.

The plaintiff urges…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Farmers' State Bank of Ada v. KeenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Halsell v. First Nat. Bank of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Fidelity Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Philadelphia v. DeanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Anderson v. MedberySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Courtney v. CourtneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Short v. Oklahoma Farmers Union Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Short v. Oklahoma Farmers Union Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API