Short v. Oklahoma Farmers Union Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentHodges, Justice
The crux of this case is whether the acts of a husband can be attributed to the wife, thus destroying her rights under an insurance policy. It is argued by the wife that: 1) under the terms of the insurance policy the rights, duties and obligations of co-insured are several, and 2) a wife cannot be barred from a cause of action solely by the independent acts of her husband.
I
Although this is a case of first impression in Oklahoma, the question of whether the obligations of co-insureds are joint or several has been determined in several jurisdictions. The view relied upon by the majority 1 is…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Watkins v. Resorts International Hotel & Casino Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- Arenson v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Fiedler v. FiedlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Howell v. Ohio Casualty Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Pawtucket Mutual Insurance v. LebrechtSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1963
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.