Legal Opinion
Quad City Builders Association, Inc. v. Tri City Bricklayers Union No. 7, Afl-Cio
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided September 25, 1970No. 19972, 19973PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN OOSTERHOUT, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal by all defendants from final judgment determining that defendants are maintaining and administering Tri City Bricklayers Union No. 7 welfare fund in violation of the equal representation requirement of § 302(c) (5) (B) of the Labor Management Relations Act (29 U.S.C.A. § 186(c) (5) (B)) hereinafter called the Act, and from the remedial relief granted. This ease was tried by Judge Stephenson without a jury. His memorandum opinion is reported at 302 F.Supp. 1031.
The facts are fully and fairly stated in the trial court’s opinion. This action was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Arroyo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Blassie v. Kroger Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Local No. 688, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. TownsendCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Quad-City Builders Ass'n v. Tri-City Bricklayers Union No. 7, AFL-CIODistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1969
3Cited by23 opinions
- Stotter Division of Graduate Plastics Company, Inc. v. District 65, United Auto Workers, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Associated Contractors of Essex County, Inc. v. Laborers International UnionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Ader v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1980
- Denver Metropolitan Association Of Plumbing, Heating, Cooling Contractors v. Journeyman Plumbers & Gas Fitters Local No. 3Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.