Lee v. PHH Mortgage
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Allan Lee, et al., No. CV-24-00057-TUC-SHR 10 Plaintiffs, Order Dismissing First Amended Complaint 11 v. 12 PHH Mortgage, 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a 17 Claim (Doc. 12). The Motion to Dismiss is fully briefed. (Doc. 11-1, 12, 16, 17.) For the 18 reasons set forth below, the Motion to Dismiss is granted and Plaintiffs are given leave to 19 amend certain claims. 20 I. Background1 21 A. The 2007 Loan 22 Plaintiffs are borrowers under two…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.