Legal Opinion

Reusch v. Seaboard System Railroad

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 20, 1990No. 88-1494PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, Justice.

John Reusch filed an action pursuant to the Federal Employers Liability Act (“FELA”), 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq., against Seaboard System Railroad (“Seaboard”), alleging both negligence and failure to provide a reasonably safe place to work. The jury returned a $50,000 verdict for Reusch, and the trial court entered judgment on the verdict. Reusch filed a motion for new trial, which the trial court did not rule upon and which was deemed denied by operation of law after 90 days, pursuant to Rule 59.1, A.R.Civ.P. Reusch appeals, arguing that the verdict is inadequate and that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. LiepeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. PfeiferSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Culver v. Slater Boat Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  4. Pate v. Sunset Funeral HomeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  5. United American Ins. Co. v. BrumleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. MoodyKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Dalebout v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
  3. Eastman v. R. Warehousing & Port Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API