Legal Opinion

Brodsky v. City of Rochester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 7, 1988PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied and preliminary injunction vacated. Memorandum: Defendant, City of Rochester, appeals from an order of Supreme Court which granted plaintiffs motion pursuant to CPLR 6301 for a preliminary injunction restraining defendant from interfering in plaintiffs use of a parcel of property, known as 20 Gould Street, as a means of ingress and egress for plaintiffs apartment complex located on East Avenue in Rochester. Plaintiff purchased the parcel from defendant in June 1987. The following restriction was appended to the deed from…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sutton, DeLeeuw, Clark & Darcy v. BeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Wiederspiel v. BernholzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Esi-Data Connections, Inc. v. ProulxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Rockland Development Associates v. Village of HillburnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API