Sutton, DeLeeuw, Clark & Darcy v. Beck
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Order reversed on the law with costs and motion denied. Memorandum: It was an abuse of discretion as a matter of law to grant plaintiffs’ application for a preliminary injunction. Plaintiffs failed to meet their burden of demonstrating, through the tender of evidentiary proof (see, Brodsky v City of Rochester, 142 AD2d 1002, 1003; Armbruster v Gipp, 103 AD2d 1014), the likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable injury absent the granting of the injunction, and that the equities weigh in their favor (see, Preston Corp. v Fabrication Enters., 68 NY2d 397, 406; Grant Co. v Srogi, 52 NY2d…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- W. T. Grant Co. v. SrogiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- J. A. Preston Corp. v. Fabrication Enterprises, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Tucker v. ToiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Walter Karl, Inc. v. WoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Kaufman v. International Business Machines Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Blueberries Gourmet, Inc. v. Aris Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- International Union of Operating Engineers v. City of Niagara FallsNew York Supreme Court · 2002
- Dental Health Associates v. ZangenehAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. TroiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Holdsworth v. DohertyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.