Legal Opinion
State v. Maddox
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided September 26, 1977PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
153 N.J. Super. 201 (1977)
379 A.2d 460
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
WARDEL MADDOX, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 12, 1977.
Decided September 26, 1977.
Before Judges ALLCORN, MORGAN and HORN.
Mr. Daniel O'Mullan argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. O'Mullan & Brady, attorneys).
Mr. Steven M. Ingis, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General, attorney).
The opinion of the court was delivered by HORN, J.A.D.
A grand jury jointly indicted defendant and one Robert Nathan Scott…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- State v. MacOnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- State v. CoruzziNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- State v. KrivacskaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- State v. BontempoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- State v. BridgesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.