State v. Johnson

Nebraska Advance Sheets 190 287 NEBRASKA REPORTS Even if expert testimony was admissible, Harris’ expert was wrong—the law does allow municipal ordinances to be requested in the praecipe rather than introduced as exhibits at the hearing.10 The district court did not err in not admitting the evidence of Harris’ expert. Harris’ second assignment of error is with- out merit. VI. CONCLUSION The decision of the district court is affirmed. Affirmed. 10 See State v. Bush, supra note 7. State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Scott D. Johnson, appellant. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed January 17, 2014. No. S-13-118.…