State v. Papasavvas
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
O’HERN, J.
In this capital case a jury has convicted defendant of murder and recommended that he be sentenced to death. Defendant contends that he was denied a fair trial. The major contentions in his appeal are that (1) the jury selection process (the voir dire) was so inadequate that it violated defendant’s constitutional rights to a fair trial; (2) that the trial court failed to excuse three jurors whose views in favor of the death penalty substantially interfered with the performance of their duties as jurors; (3) that, conversely, the trial court…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Adams v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. RamseurSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- State v. YarboughSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- State v. MarshallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- Polzo v. County of EssexSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
- State v. ReddishSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- State v. WakefieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- State v. KoskovichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.