Truax v. Raich
Supreme Court of the United States
APPÉAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. The facts, which involve the constitutionality under the equal protection provision of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Act of December 14, 1914, of the State of Arizona relative to the employment of aliens in that State, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court 1
239 U.S. 33 (1915)
TRUAX AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
v.
RAICH.
No. 361.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued October 15, 1915.
Decided November 1, 1915.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA.
Mr. Wiley E. Jones, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Mr. Leslie C. Hardy, Assistant Attorney General of the State of Arizona, with whom Mr. George W. Harben, Assistant Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Mr. J. Addison Hicks and Mr. W.B. Cleary were on the brief, for appellants.
Mr. Alexander Britton, with whom Mr. Evans Browne and Mr.…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Hughes.
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Fong Yue Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Arizona Dream Act Coalition v. Janice BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017